This is not a ban or even a moratorium in the usual sense. It’s simply a proposal to require adequate safety measures for a technology that, according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction. Is that too much to ask?
Stuart Russell
UC Berkeley computer science professor and co-author of Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
In a 2026 Future of Life Institute release, Stuart Russell said the proposal for AI that outperforms humans at most mental tasks was a safety requirement, not a conventional ban or moratorium, and said its developers saw a significant chance of human extinction.
Professor of Computer Science, University of California, BerkeleyPublished March 27, 2026 · date of remarks not establishedPress release: Prominent Scientists, Faith Leaders, Policymakers and Artists Call for a Prohibition on Superintelligence, as Poll Shows Americans Don’t Want It
Context and checks
Surrounding words
Most people don’t want that. But that’s what these big tech companies mean when they talk about building ‘Superintelligence’.” Stuart Russell: “This is not a ban or even a moratorium in the usual sense. It’s simply a proposal to require adequate safety measures for a technology that, according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction. Is that too much to ask?” Walter Kim: “If we race to build superintelligence without clear and morally informed parameters, we risk undermining the incredible potential AI has to alleviate suffering and enable flourishing.
What this quote does not say
- The quote is supplied in an issuer press release rather than an independently preserved recording or person-authored document.
- Russell provides no numeric probability and explicitly attributes the risk estimate to developers.
How this was checked
- Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.
Reviewed by
an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check
