But creating the most powerful system does not always mean creating the system that best serves the well-being of the American people. Even if we “win” the global race to develop these uncontrollable AI systems, we risk losing our social stability, security, and possibly even our species in the process.
Max Tegmark
MIT physicist and co-founder of the Future of Life Institute
In a 2023 Senate forum statement, Max Tegmark wrote that racing to build uncontrollable AI could cost humanity its species as well as social stability and security.
Co-Founder and President of the Future of Life Institute; Professor of Physics at Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyOctober 24, 2023Second Bipartisan Senate AI Insight Forum: Innovation
Context and checks
Surrounding words
This is what “innovation” means to them. But creating the most powerful system does not always mean creating the system that best serves the well-being of the American people. Even if we “win” the global race to develop these uncontrollable AI systems, we risk losing our social stability, security, and possibly even our species in the process. Far from ensuring geopolitical dominance, the destabilizing effect of haphazard proliferation of increasingly powerful AI systems is likely to put the United States at a substantial geopolitical disadvantage, sewing domestic
What this quote does not say
- The passage states a possibility rather than a numerical probability.
- In the same statement, Tegmark said AI is not inherently bad and distinguished uncontrollable systems from narrow and controllable AI, whose benefits he supported.
How this was checked
- Quote located in the captured page; spacing normalised for display.
Reviewed by
an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check
