Politicians and public officials

George Whitesides

U.S. Representative for California's 27th district; House Armed Services Committee

3 records

Records

“As the Representative for a district at the heart of California’s aerospace and technology industry, I’ve seen firsthand how vital American innovation is to our national security. But as AI models grow exponentially more capable, the risk of these systems being exploited or weaponized poses a direct threat to public safety,”

George Whitesides

U.S. Representative for California's 27th district; House Armed Services Committee

In a July 2026 release announcing a bipartisan bill on AI security threats, Whitesides said that as AI models grow exponentially more capable, the risk of these systems being exploited or weaponized poses a direct threat to public safety.

U.S. Representative for California's 27th Congressional DistrictPublished July 23, 2026 · date of remarks not establishedOfficial House office news release

Source Archived

Context and checks

Surrounding words

… proprietary models with millions of queries and use the resulting data to train rival, foreign-based systems, essentially reverse-engineering American technology at a lower cost and with less strain on valuable computational resources. “As the Representative for a district at the heart of California’s aerospace and technology industry, I’ve seen firsthand how vital American innovation is to our national security. But as AI models grow exponentially more capable, the risk of these systems being exploited or weaponized poses a direct threat to public safety,” “By authorizing threat intelligence sharing to defend against hostile foreign attacks, this bipartisan bill prevents our technology from being turned against us.

What this quote does not say

The warning concerns adversarial exploitation and weaponization, not autonomous loss of control or extinction.
The second half of the same quote frames the bill as safeguarding America's technological edge against foreign adversaries, so the risk named is adversarial exploitation rather than a general case for restraint.

How this was checked

Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check

“We cannot afford to leave our defense systems vulnerable while our adversaries race to develop the same capabilities. The Pentagon needs to explain how it plans to close the gap – and fast.”

George Whitesides

U.S. Representative for California's 27th district; House Armed Services Committee

In an April 2026 release on a letter he and Rep. Chrissy Houlahan sent the Defense Secretary about a Pentagon designation blocking military access to Anthropic's AI cybersecurity tools, Whitesides said the United States cannot afford to leave its defense systems vulnerable while adversaries race to develop the same capabilities, and that the Pentagon needs to explain how it plans to close the gap.

U.S. Representative for California's 27th Congressional District and member of the House Armed Services CommitteePublished April 22, 2026 · date of remarks not establishedOfficial House office news release

Source Archived

Context and checks

Surrounding words

“American companies are building the most powerful cybersecurity tools in the world, and we’re blocking our own military from using them,” said Rep. Whitesides. “We cannot afford to leave our defense systems vulnerable while our adversaries race to develop the same capabilities. The Pentagon needs to explain how it plans to close the gap – and fast.” “Anthropic’s announcement of the incredible and dangerous capabilities of their new model highlights the importance and value of public-private partnerships in ensuring our continued security in cyberspace,” said Rep.

What this quote does not say

This is a balancing or countervailing position, not an explicit recantation of the February guardrail concern.
The passage addresses access to AI-enabled cyber defense, not a general view that advanced-AI risks are exaggerated.

How this was checked

Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check

Accordingly, I request that the Department pause on making any decisions until fully evaluating how this ultimatum will undermine public trust and set a dangerous precedent for industry.

George Whitesides

U.S. Representative for California's 27th district; House Armed Services Committee

In a February 2026 letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about a reported Pentagon ultimatum to Anthropic, Whitesides requested that the Department pause any decisions until it had fully evaluated how the ultimatum would undermine public trust and set a dangerous precedent for industry.

U.S. Representative for California's 27th Congressional District and member of the House Armed Services CommitteeFebruary 27, 2026Whitesides-authored letter to the U.S. Secretary of Defense

Source Archived

Context and checks

Surrounding words

… believes additional authorities are needed to meet mission requirements, those questions should be brought to Congress directly, not resolved through brinkmanship with a single vendor. Accordingly, I request that the Department pause on making any decisions until fully evaluating how this ultimatum will undermine public trust and set a dangerous precedent for industry. dangerous precedent for industry. I strongly support ensuring our warfighters have access to the best tools.

What this quote does not say

The requested pause applies to the reported Pentagon ultimatum and removal of vendor guardrails, not to AI development generally.
The letter's cited press reports were not treated as proof that the ultimatum occurred exactly as described.

How this was checked

Quote located in the captured page; spacing normalised for display.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check