And that is why the 10-year AI State moratorium that my Republican colleagues jammed through in their reconciliation bill is so misguided and dangerous. We can't afford a 10-year hold on our States' ability to identify and protect the American people from AI-specific harms, not when AI is developing rapidly and spreading to all parts of our lives, and especially not without strong Federal AI safe guardrails in place.
Doris Matsui
U.S. representative from California; ranking member, House Communications and Technology Subcommittee
At a June 2025 House Energy and Commerce subcommittee hearing, Doris Matsui said the 10-year state AI moratorium in the reconciliation bill is misguided and dangerous because states could not identify or protect Americans from AI-specific harms while no strong federal guardrails are in place.
Ranking Member, House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and TechnologyJune 4, 2025House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology hearing, AI in the Everyday: Current Applications and Future Frontiers in Communications and Technology
Context and checks
Surrounding words
Now is the time to learn from our States and work on bipartisan solutions to advance innovation and empower all Americans to access the benefits of AI. And that is why the 10-year AI State moratorium that my Republican colleagues jammed through in their reconciliation bill is so misguided and dangerous. We can't afford a 10-year hold on our States' ability to identify and protect the American people from AI-specific harms, not when AI is developing rapidly and spreading to all parts of our lives, and especially not without strong Federal AI safe guardrails in place. I look forward to hearing from our witnesses about how we can strengthen our AI leadership. And with that, I yield the balance of my time. [The prepared statement of Ms.
What this quote does not say
- The official transcript's oral wording contains minor grammatical irregularities; those are preserved rather than silently conformed to the separately opened prepared statement.
- The passage does not specify particular AI harms or endorse an existential-risk framing.
How this was checked
- Quote located in the captured page; spacing normalised for display.
Reviewed by
an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check
