Back to everyone

Leaders of other countries

David Pocock

Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

4 records

Portrait source: Magee425, CC BY-SA 4.0

Records

But it’s also a technology that has the potential to totally disrupt society – one that could even pose an “existential risk” to us as a species.

David Pocock

Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

In a June 2026 opinion article, David Pocock wrote that AI has the potential to totally disrupt society and could even pose an “existential risk” to us as a species.

Independent Senator for the Australian Capital TerritoryPublished June 9, 2026 · date of remarks not establishedAuthored opinion article

Context and checks

Surrounding words

We also need to ask the question – what is this all for? There are undoubtedly many exciting applications of AI. But it’s also a technology that has the potential to totally disrupt society – one that could even pose an “existential risk” to us as a species. AI job losses in Australia have already topped the tens of thousands and the Jobs and Skills Australia commissioner, Barney Glover, has said job losses are expected to be more than 600,000.

What this quote does not say

  • The claim is possibility language (“could” and “potential”), not a probability estimate or prediction.
  • The quotation marks around “existential risk” are Pocock's own; in the Guardian page the phrase carries a hyperlink to a CNN explainer. The proposition itself appears in his authored text.

How this was checked

  • Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check

The Government fund a national AI safety centre in the next federal budget - this was one of the most consistently raised recommendations from witnesses during the inquiry and I was disappointed to not see it in the committees report

David Pocock

Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

In a December 2024 update on his official website, David Pocock recommended that the Australian government fund a national AI safety centre in the next federal budget, saying he was disappointed not to see it in the parliamentary committee's report.

Independent Senator for the Australian Capital TerritoryPublished December 4, 2024 · date of remarks not establishedOfficial senator website update

Context and checks

Surrounding words

consideration of the Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Communications) Bill 2024 with amendments that would see the use of artificial intelligence banned in electoral matter with effect prior to the next federal election. - The Government fund a national AI safety centre in the next federal budget - this was one of the most consistently raised recommendations from witnesses during the inquiry and I was disappointed to not see it in the committees report - The Government should urgently bring forward a bill to amend the Copyright Act to strengthen prohibitions on copyright infringement, clarify how copyright law applies to generative AI, and separately to fund the establishment of a

What this quote does not say

  • The update summarizes a recommendation associated with the committee report; the separately hosted parliamentary additional-comments page could not be opened in this tool.
  • The sentence does not specify the centre's powers, independence, budget, or technical remit.

How this was checked

  • Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check

This is a case of two things being true. The prime minister articulated an ambitious vision for Australia as a world leader on AI. He said he wants to protect creatives and safeguard society, the environment and the economy. He should be commended for that.

David Pocock

Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

In a July 2026 opinion article criticising the Australian prime minister's AI speech for lacking policy detail, David Pocock wrote that the prime minister had articulated an ambitious vision for Australia as a world leader on AI and should be commended for that.

Independent Senator for the Australian Capital TerritoryPublished July 16, 2026 · date of remarks not establishedAuthored opinion article

Context and checks

Surrounding words

Multinational gas companies are masters at tax minimisation and offshoring profit but when it comes to the big tech companies it’s clearly a case of “hold my beer”. This is a case of two things being true. The prime minister articulated an ambitious vision for Australia as a world leader on AI. He said he wants to protect creatives and safeguard society, the environment and the economy. He should be commended for that. At the same time, it’s unclear how he plans to achieve those ambitious aims. There are many parts of the AI story he did not address. It’s our job, as parliamentarians and citizens, to keep demanding answers to those questions.

What this quote does not say

  • This does not contradict or withdraw the earlier existential-risk statement.
  • The article as a whole is a critique, not an endorsement: it opens by saying the speech “fell short on policy detail” and lists the omissions — no tax plan, no retraining investment, no sovereign AI capability, no answer on construction workforce shortages — with the praise confined to this one paragraph.

How this was checked

  • Quote matched character-for-character against the captured page.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source · an automatic character-by-character check

Statements they signed

FROM THE SIGNED STATEMENT

The next government will shape whether AI becomes a powerful force for good or causes catastrophic harm.

Signed statement:Australia Must Act on AI Risks Now” (Australians for AI Safety)

David Pocock

Senator for the Australian Capital Territory

Signed as part of a group statement. Not spoken.

David Pocock signed Australia Must Act on AI Risks Now, which asks the Australian government to create an AI Safety Institute and require safety standards for powerful AI systems.

Independent Senator for ACTDate not establishedAustralia Must Act on AI Risks Now

Context and checks

Surrounding words

Dr. Toby Ord Oxford University Senior Researcher Author of The Precipice Senator David Pocock Independent Senator for ACT Prof. Huw Price University of Cambridge Emeritus Bertrand Russell Professor & Emeritus Fellow, Trinity College, Cambridge Co-founder of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and former Academic Director

What this quote does not say

  • The roster names him as “Senator David Pocock” and gives the role wording “Independent” followed by “Senator for ACT.”

How this was checked

  • The organiser's own roster lists this person as a signer.

Reviewed by

an AI reviewer that read the whole source